Which of the 12 Relationship Patterns Best Describes Yours? – Psychology Today

Which of the 12 Relationship Patterns Best Describes Yours? – Psychology Today

Knowing what you value will help you build the most meaningful life possible.
Verified by Psychology Today
Posted  | Reviewed by Michelle Quirk
All relationships have trouble spots, which, when triggered, create conflict. In your own relationship, you may be aware of these areas although you haven’t formally tried to categorize them. Perhaps one of you wants to know where the other partner is at all times while the other prefers being off all grids, including yours. Smartphone apps that make this possible have now become an area of contention.
Maybe you and your partner differ in another key area, such as the way that you express criticism. One of you is very direct, but the other one takes pride in being the ultimate diplomat. Not only do you therefore get into arguments when one utters an openly critical comment to the other, but this also creates tension in your larger circle of family and friends.
The idea that partners have typical ways of interacting that repeat is behind new research by Clark University’s Jenna Rice and colleagues (2022). By going through the process of “relationship pattern labeling” (RPL), it should be possible, the authors maintain, to improve the health of your relationship as well as even the physical health of both you and your partner.
RPL requires that couples take an honest and hard look at their typical ways of interacting with each other to look for repeated themes. As a method of couples therapy, Rice et al. propose that RPL could assist counselors in working with couples to pull out these themes in their daily lives and help to change the dynamics that are serving to erode the quality of their intimacy.
This might sound like an intimidating process, and, indeed, the Clark U. researchers acknowledge that it can be difficult to plunge into such a potentially painful diagnosis of yourself and your partner. To mitigate against the negativity that such finger-pointing could lead to, Rice and her coauthors suggest the value of using “relational frames.” Using language to “frame” your relationship can aid in “transforming previously aversive experiences into more tolerable or acceptable experiences” (p. 3).
The logic behind this approach is simple. Let’s say that you’re the one who insists on being able to track your partner (not to stalk them, but to feel comforted that they’re safe). In RPL, you would give this behavior a name that would evoke a “metaphor” or “image.” This image, in turn, could help your partner understand where the behavior is coming from. Most importantly, this should be nonjudgmental, providing a shorthand for couples to use when they try to change their RPLs. It could even be humorous. As you’ll see in the 12 RPLs that follow, the name in this case would be “cactus,” and the more standoffish partner would be the “fern.”
The Clark U. authors tested the value of an RPL intervention on several relationship quality indicators in committed romantic partners. The 124 student (graduate and undergraduate) participants in their study identified their own RPLs by reading descriptions of each pattern. Then they completed a scripted discussion that emphasized drawing out each partner’s “understandable reasons” for behaving as they did to stimulate empathic understanding. The intervention also included information about the “blameless inevitability of ‘friction’ in close relationships” (p. 7).
Across the three test points, the second of which involved the experimental intervention, the authors demonstrated favorable effects, compared to controls, on measures of intimacy, partner acceptance, and overall satisfaction. The effects were statistically significant, but objectively small. Additionally, those who completed the three phases of the study were higher in intimacy and relationship satisfaction prior to the intervention. The authors acknowledged these limitations, suggesting that their work could provide the springboard for future and better-controlled studies. Even so, the concept of RPL is intriguing and, as Rice et al. suggest, shows the value of addressing language as a “frame” for relationship therapy compared to only addressing the emotional components of a couple’s relationship.
With this background in mind, it’s time to turn to the 12 RPLs, extracted from the paper’s supplemental materials. Which pattern best describes yours?
It’s possible you found more than one that seems to characterize your relationship. However, remember that in the Clark U. study, both partners completed this exercise together. Checking out your own assessment with your partner could provide the first step not just in figuring out which RPL best fits your relationship, but also to proceed to gaining insight into those “understandable reasons” that lead each of you to behave as you do.
To sum up, relationships may be hard to pigeonhole. By using the RPL as a guide, you and your partner may not come up with the “one” that fits you, but the process can help promote greater empathy and ultimately fulfillment as you build toward the future.
Rice, J., McTernan, M., & Cordova, J. (2022). The influence of relationship pattern labeling on intimacy, acceptance, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy.. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12623
Susan Krauss Whitbourne, Ph.D., is a Professor Emerita of Psychological and Brain Sciences at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Her latest book is The Search for Fulfillment.
Get the help you need from a therapist near you–a FREE service from Psychology Today.
Psychology Today © 2023 Sussex Publishers, LLC
Knowing what you value will help you build the most meaningful life possible.


Apk Bazar

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *